Skip to main content

About your Search

20130801
20130831
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
, but a lot would have to go to private institutions, to go to bank of america who could jack up the price or interests a lot higher than government, that creates another problem. neil: you do see that -- you keep feeding the beast. >> you put a ceiling on what government can give you is fine, but have to go to private lenders. i would have had to go to bank of america for example or whatever it was. you know because i'm ancient, they did not exist. neil: then i am -- scotty, we have to do something we can recognize risk of thoseho need the aid not getting aid, but bigger risk no one gets aid because it will be priced out. >> not like the republicans are against education, but what is the real hype crease, barack obama is champions students supposedly, he will make $50 billion in profit off of the interest from the loans, ise doing this in best interest of students, if we gave government grants to make it equal to have status quo is fine, but this administration is using it to make a profit to make up for other losses. >> you are suggests that other presidents did not have pehl grants orel
industry is in shammens, and, in fact, mexico, one of the great parts of the north america with all the oil reserves could be a net oil importer without this help so they need it desperately praying that it will. lori: what's the impact on world oil prices? >> i think in the short term, not a lot. if you look at oil prices there, excited about this? no. the big picture is the big oil majors getting in there, start projects, and they turn around decline of mexican production. it's going to make north america a power house with energy production, and it's good for the entire region. lori: that's the goal. thank you. >> thank you. lori: breaking news, hearing first word now from u.s. airways and american airlines in a joint press release. they will fight the effort by the department of justice working to ham their merger saying they'll have a strong defense against the government's lawsuit and basically denouncing the government's claim this is anticompetitive and cuts jobs, and, in fact, it benefits flying consumers. adam: people question the timing of the announcement from the doj. more to c
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)